Georgetown University home page Search: Full text search Site Index: Find a web site by name or keyword Site Map: Overview of main pages Directory: Find a person; contact us About this site: Copyright, disclaimer, policies, terms of use Georgetown University home page Home page for prospective students Home page for current students Home page for alumni and alumnae Home page for family and friends Home page for faculty and staff Georgetown University Search: Full text search Site Index: Find a web site by name or keyword Site Map: Overview of main pages Directory: Find a person; contact us About this site: Copyright, disclaimer, policies, terms of use
Navigation bar Navigation bar
spacer spacer spacer spacer
border
spacer spacer spacer
border
spacer spacer

Lights, Camera, Action: Quantitative Analysis of Systematic Variation in Two-dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis

Sellers, K.F., Miecznikowski, J.C., Viswanathan, S., Eddy, W.F., and Minden, J. . "Lights, Camera, Action: Quantitative Analysis of Systematic Variation in Two-dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis." Electrophoresis 28.18 (2007): 3324-3332.

2-D Difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) circumvents many of the problems associated with gel comparison via the traditional 2-DE approach. DIGE’s accuracy and precision, however, is compromised by the existence of other significant sources of systematic variation, including that caused by the apparatus used for imaging proteins (location of the camera and lighting units, background material, imperfections within that material, etc.). Through a series of experiments, we estimate some of these factors, and account for their effect on the DIGE experimental data, thus providing improved estimates of the true relative protein intensities. The model presented here includes 2-DE images as a special case. Keywords: ANOVA, 2-DE, Normalization, Systematic variation

» More publications by Kimberly F Sellers

spacer spacer
Navigation bar Navigation bar